More NECC Reflections
I’m still working through blogs and podcasts from the conference. (It’s been
great to catch sessions I was unable to attend while I was there.)Some time ago I wrote a post entitled It’s Not About The Wires where I suggested that technology education is not about gadgets for the sake of gadgets but about the thinking students do as a result of using technology. I think that is why Alan November’s session Teaching Zack to Think resonated well with me. My ideas were challenged by Gary Stager during his session Preventing Your One-to-one Dreams From Becoming Nightmares. He said it is about the technology. At first I wasn’t sure if his thesis contradicted my earlier thinking but upon reflection I realized it didn’t. The thinking that goes into a technology project is fundamentally different than the thinking in another type of project. For example, the thinking involved in a Lego robotics project is the way it is because of the technology being used. I am not a programmer. When I first started teaching I taught programming in Basic but that was a long time ago. I know enough to know that there is a way of thinking that fits programming. Programming necessitates a certain “approach” to a problem. That approach is a way of thinking. I agree with Stager. The technology is important. It’s important because of the way it shapes thinking. It’s important because it demands a discipline of thought that is not used in all other areas of education and life.